Not because of the subject matter, but because of what it proposes:
The fact that this woman has to deny that she is collaborating with others to destroy this man is fucking appalling. Why does she have to deny this?
Because everyone knows that men don't really ever rape women and that for sure, powerful men don't do it. They don't have to, cause they already have what they want - money, material things, hot wives, whatever. Let's just forget that men like that develop an insatiable sense of entitlement and can never feel like they are adequately in control. It's always more, more, more, just like the drug addict.
Stupid women lying to destroy men.
Poor, poor men. Always the victims. It's hard being man.
Maid's lawyer: IMF sex assault case no setup
The fact that this woman has to deny that she is collaborating with others to destroy this man is fucking appalling. Why does she have to deny this?
Because everyone knows that men don't really ever rape women and that for sure, powerful men don't do it. They don't have to, cause they already have what they want - money, material things, hot wives, whatever. Let's just forget that men like that develop an insatiable sense of entitlement and can never feel like they are adequately in control. It's always more, more, more, just like the drug addict.
Stupid women lying to destroy men.
Poor, poor men. Always the victims. It's hard being man.
No comments:
Post a Comment